AI & Agent Readiness
We review technical SEO, business information, content and customer journeys, then implement the worthwhile improvements. Where compatible agent tools serve a useful purpose, we configure and test them too.
FREE WEBSITE CHECK
Enter your public domain for an automated homepage check. The scanner looks for selected access, indexing-directive, metadata, structured-data and interaction signals. Use its findings as a starting point for investigation.
This is a limited technical snapshot. A high score means the inspected signals passed those checks; it does not certify the whole website, its content quality, speed or visibility in AI answers. The free check does not crawl every page, confirm Google indexing, run a mobile performance audit or demonstrate that an agent can complete a task.
WHY THE FOUNDATIONS MATTER
A customer needs to understand what you offer, whether it fits their needs and why they should trust you. Search and AI systems need accessible information that describes the business accurately. Technical barriers, conflicting details and vague service pages can make both journeys harder.
AI & Agent Readiness builds on sound SEO, clear content and a usable website. We investigate the issues that matter to your business, from accidental indexing restrictions to weak service information and awkward enquiry routes. The purpose is to make the website more useful and dependable, with improvements that can be checked afterwards.
NU SIGNATURE WORDPRESS TOOLS
Our diagnostic scanner checks selected public website signals. Our Agent Ready WordPress plugin serves a different purpose: exposing reviewed business information and approved website functions as structured tools for compatible agents.
In a Chrome WebMCP pilot on the Nu Signature website, an agent discovered six tools and retrieved our Tanzania market page and an AI travel-planning article. That demonstrates structured discovery under those test conditions. It does not establish improved search rankings, completed enquiries or increased sales.
Tools can help an agent find services, markets, project evidence and published insights. Enquiry actions require explicit configuration, appropriate consent and separate testing. Booking systems and live availability require their own integrations and scope. Site owners control what is exposed; the plugin does not grant unrestricted access to WordPress.
★★★★★ · EMILE VAN DEN HEETKAMP · GOOGLE REVIEW
THREE QUESTIONS, DIFFERENT EVIDENCE
These are connected parts of a customer journey, but each needs its own evidence. A technical score cannot stand in for all three.
Can the inspected public page be retrieved, and what access, metadata, structured-information and interaction signals are visible? The free scanner provides a limited starting point. A deeper review examines selected pages and verifies important findings.
Does an AI search experience actually mention, describe or cite the business for a relevant question? The free scanner does not measure this. A separate assessment needs recorded queries, dates, platforms and sources, because answers can vary.
Can a compatible agent retrieve the right information, prepare a useful next step and, where authorised, complete an approved action? These stages must be tested separately. Detecting a form or WebMCP-related code does not prove successful tool use or submission.
UNDERSTAND YOUR RESULTS
The useful question is what was checked, what was found and what still needs investigation. A homepage can pass basic checks while deeper service pages have significant problems.
Investigate observed crawler restrictions, noindex directives and sitemap problems first. A canonical tag or sitemap being present does not prove that its contents are correct. Public checks can reveal barriers; actual Google index status needs Search Console evidence where access is available.
A title, heading or schema block is a signal of presence, not proof of quality. A fuller review checks whether services, locations, expertise and evidence are clear and consistent across priority pages, and whether structured data agrees with the visible content.
A server-side fetch time is not a mobile speed score or a Core Web Vitals assessment. Performance needs named lab measurements and real-user data where available. Forms, booking routes and agent tools also need practical testing, rather than an assumption that they work because they exist.
COMMON QUESTIONS
Start with the free homepage check, then use these answers to understand its findings and the scope of a deeper review.
SEO addresses how useful pages can be discovered and understood in search. GEO, or generative engine optimisation, is a term used for work intended to support accurate discovery and interpretation in AI answers. Our work centres on accessible content, consistent business information and credible evidence. Agent readiness concerns whether a compatible agent can use approved website functions. These outcomes require different tests.
No. It reflects the automated checks within that scan's limited coverage. It is not an official Google, OpenAI or browser-industry certification. A high result can coexist with duplicate service-page metadata, indexing problems elsewhere, weak content or poor mobile performance. We do not invent faults when the inspected foundations are sound.
No. Any response timing is a single scanner observation, not a Lighthouse, PageSpeed Insights or real-user performance assessment. Public indexing directives indicate possible restrictions; they do not confirm whether Google has indexed a page. Deeper performance and indexing checks use the appropriate tools and owner-authorised data.
There is no universal requirement for these features. Google says its AI search features use the same SEO foundations and do not require special AI files or schema. WebMCP is an emerging way to offer website tools to compatible agents, with support that varies by platform and browser. We recommend it when there is a useful task to serve, not as a promise of better rankings.
The free check provides an automated starting point. The R2,950 AI & Agent Readiness Review covers one website and up to five priority pages selected with you. We validate relevant findings, review search and business-information foundations, and identify the improvements worth pursuing. The agreed review can include named performance checks and owner-authorised search data where relevant. Agent scenarios and AI-answer monitoring are agreed explicitly, rather than implied by a score. You receive a concise PDF findings report and a 30-minute discussion within five working days of agreeing the pages and receiving any required access. The price includes any applicable VAT. Implementation, custom integrations and additional testing are scoped and quoted separately.
SELECTED WEBSITE WORK / DESIGN AFRIQUE
Clear business positioning, useful destination content and a considered customer journey are part of the website work that supports our approach.
The Design Afrique case study illustrates that wider work; it is not presented as proof of an AI ranking or agent-readiness result.
Read the Design Afrique case studyTHE METHOD
A useful review should leave you with a practical next step and a way to assess the result.
01
Review the agreed pages, technical access, business information and customer routes. Record the evidence, limitations and questions that require additional access or testing.
02
Separate observed faults from unverified concerns and optional improvements. Set an implementation backlog around likely business impact, effort and dependencies.
03
Scope the worthwhile fixes. These may involve technical SEO, content architecture, structured data, internal linking, performance or enquiry journeys. Configure agent tools only where the use case and supported technology justify them.
04
For an agreed implementation, repeat the relevant checks and customer scenarios. Record what changed, what remains uncertain and who owns ongoing maintenance. Retrieval, preparation and submission are recorded as separate agent outcomes.
CORPORATE AND MULTI-BRAND
For organisations with several brands, markets or divisions, begin with one website or customer journey. Agree content ownership, access permissions, security and data handling before introducing actions or connecting live systems. Expand using the evidence from the pilot.
WAYS TO BEGIN
AI & Agent Readiness Review: R2,950, including any applicable VAT. One website, up to five agreed priority pages, a concise PDF findings report and a 30-minute discussion. Delivery is within five working days of confirming scope and receiving any required access.
Implementation is quoted after the findings identify worthwhile improvements. Scope can include technical SEO, content, entity information, structured data, performance, customer journeys and appropriate agent tools. Retesting is defined as part of the agreed implementation.
SCOPED TO YOUR WEBSITE
Tell us what customers need to find or do, and where the website gets in their way. We will recommend a focused review with clear scope, useful evidence and a practical route to improvement.
Related reading: Agent-Ready WordPress Websites: What WebMCP Can Actually Do
Request an Agent Readiness ReviewNU SIGNATURE / MENU
SOUTH AFRICAN. WORKING GLOBALLY.
